Monday, October 21, 2019



4 comments:

  1. hard to read as words, and as faces.
    that may be your intention. but what is the incentive to decipher? what's the payoff.

    if displayed opposite a "real" face, e.g., yours or others', there would be the implication that decipherment would yield some insight about the "real" face, or help to understand something you're trying to imply about the inscrutability of the individual.
    (this comes to mind: "the junk science of emotion-recognition technology," at
    https://theoutline.com/post/8118/junk-emotion-recognition-technology?zd=1&zi=aosunjzk



    the minimalism of these word-pictures means, probably, that some thought should go into what the letter styles are. why digital? why these typefaces, versus others.
    what about manual typewriter, enlarged?



    other ideas (with letter-pictures) —
    bring the letters close together, overlapping (i.e., NOT creating a face). outline, etc etc, to create a jigsaw puzzle lines. lay these down over photographs of faces, do something with them, e.g., distort face. as if radical reconstruction, of a dramatically damaged (or even missing) face.



    am thinking of Giuseppe Arcimboldo
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giuseppe_Arcimboldo

    ReplyDelete
  2. p.s.,
    title to this post?
    explanation of what we are looking at, and what you are thinking about it?

    ReplyDelete
  3. this too (the typographic jigsaw puzzle idea) —
    Bridget Riley, Rajasthan, 2012.
    https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2019/oct/22/bridget-riley-review-hayward-gallery#img-4

    ReplyDelete
  4. more, on facial recognition etc
    https://twitter.com/EvanSelinger/status/1187811757215105024
    interesting and relevant to your project (I believe).

    ReplyDelete